TemplatesReview

Reconcile feedback from three readers

Compare three readers' actual notes on a draft, find agreements and conflicts, and turn them into a revision plan without pretending that every comment can be followed at once.

Sample results: runs and scores on this page are illustrations while testing is set up. How we test

  • Who it is for: A writer or editor combining comments from a manager, a subject expert and the intended reader.
  • Time: 20 minutes

Download it, in the format you use

Choose one format

  • Prompt chain

    Copy each step into ChatGPT or Claude, one after another.

Open in the Editor

Using a download:How to use this in n8nHow to install a Claude skill

Try an input Sample

Three reviewers raise different needs, and two disagree on whether the attendance estimate is ready to promise.

What this sample should produce

Ask for the basis of the $900 and 100-resident estimates, and define success before stating an August expansion as a commitment. The board cannot infer location or price to attend from the draft. Keep the manager's and finance reviewer's different positions visible instead of claiming consensus.

A result guide for this invented input, not an AI reply.

Draft under review
We propose a Saturday workshop pilot in June. Four sessions will serve 100 residents for $900. Registration will open next week. If successful, we will expand in August.
Three readers' notes
Program manager: Define successful before promising an August expansion. Keep the 100-resident figure prominent because the board wants reach. Finance reviewer: Explain the $900 estimate. Do not promise 100 residents until the basis for that estimate is checked. Resident reader: Tell me where the sessions take place and whether attending costs anything.
What the draft must do
Give the community board enough information to decide whether to approve the June pilot.
Try Step 1 with this sample

This is the selected sample placed into the first prompt. Copy or open it in your own AI, then use the downloaded chain for later steps and checks.

You are a careful editor recording feedback from three readers.

Your task is to list each distinct comment from the readers' notes.

Readers' notes:
Program manager: Define successful before promising an August expansion. Keep the 100-resident figure prominent because the board wants reach.
Finance reviewer: Explain the $900 estimate. Do not promise 100 residents until the basis for that estimate is checked.
Resident reader: Tell me where the sessions take place and whether attending costs anything.

Draft:
We propose a Saturday workshop pilot in June. Four sessions will serve 100 residents for $900. Registration will open next week. If successful, we will expand in August.


Rules:
- Name the reader and quote the relevant comment word for word. Split a comment that asks for two changes into two rows.
- Name the draft passage or section it concerns. If none is clear, write Whole draft.
- Do not merge two readers into one voice. Do not infer what a silent reader wanted.

Return one markdown table: | Reader | Comment (quote) | Draft part |
Open ChatGPTOpens a blank chat. This result is copied for you to paste and review there.